Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Remembrance results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 1,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,262 of 16,562 topics). This Community Remembrance is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Community Remembrance
Topic details
Total words: 2,168
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos