Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Relief results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59.1% saturation with 1,315 hits. Analysis detected 6,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,226 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,250 of 16,562 topics). This Community Relief is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Community Relief
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠93%Community Relief (selected)11%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,226
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.5% percentile
10.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 54.2%54.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 59.1%59.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 27.7%27.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 26.3%26.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.1%18.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 59.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 54.2%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos