Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Recovery results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 590 hits. Analysis detected 5,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,996 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,140 of 16,562 topics). This Community Recovery is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Community Recovery
Topic details
Total words: 8,996
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos