Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Rebuilding results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 910 hits. Analysis detected 6,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (10,840 of 15,327 topics). This Community Rebuilding is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Community Rebuilding
Topic details
Total words: 7,872
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate