Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Mural results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,336 of 16,562 topics). This Community Mural is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Community Mural
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.9%2.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos