Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video598 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Monitoring Of Raids results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 882 hits. Analysis detected 3,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,901 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,455 of 16,562 topics). This Community Monitoring Of Raids is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Community Monitoring Of Raids
Topic details
Total words: 2,901
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 9.5%9.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 30.4%30.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos