Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Monitoring results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 2,017 hits. Analysis detected 11,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,899 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,560 of 16,562 topics). This Community Monitoring is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Community Monitoring
Topic details
Total words: 3,899
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
9.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 51.7%51.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 47.4%47.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 29.3%29.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 29.3%29.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 51.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 47.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 26.9%Bandwagon: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos