Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Gatherings results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,733 of 16,562 topics). This Community Gatherings is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Community Gatherings
Topic details
Total words: 4,104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos