Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 1,368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kenn Cook results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 459 hits . Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,446 of 6,359 authors). This Kenn Cook is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Kenn Cook
Author details
Total words: 4,104
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst