Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Aid results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Recency Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 437 hits. Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,314 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,293 of 16,129 topics). This Community Aid is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Community Aid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,314
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 33.3%33.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos