Topic summary
⁠27%3 analyzed articles/videos3,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Action results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 940 hits. Analysis detected 7,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,075 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,246 of 16,411 topics). This Community Action is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Community Action
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,075
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos