Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Phillips results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,651 hits . Analysis detected 14,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,001 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,524 of 6,244 authors). This Tom Phillips is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Tom Phillips
Author details
Total words: 12,001
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst