‘We feel angry  and we have reason to be’: Brazil’s resurgent punk scene is a howl of outrage at injustice 79%

By Tom Phillips0%

5/2/2026, 5:00:18 AM

Topics: Features

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 2,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,251 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,588 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the article peer group.

As black-clad police combatants charged into the hillside favela and opened fire, a black-clad punk scurried out of the community in the opposite direction, his hands trembling from fright. 
“Holy shit! 
All those guns! 
Things are getting ugly!” 
spluttered Rodrigo Cilirio, the founder and bassist of one of Rio’s most enduring punk bands, as he took cover behind a tree. 
It was here in the Morro da Lagartixa on Rio’s volatile northside that Cilirio’s group, Repressão Social (Social Repression), was born just over 30 years ago: a howl of rage against the relentless cycle of urban violence, police brutality, deprivation and discrimination that continues to plague the outskirts of Brazil’s largest cities. 
“[Punk] is my way of letting it all out so I don’t choke to death. 
It’s my voice,” Cilirio, 47, explained while waiting for the gunfire to subside near the favela where he grew up. 
 
This 
is what we are exposed to,” the black musician sighed of that morning’s gun battle, during which one local was shot in the leg. 
“Punks go through what everyone goes through: bullets flying and a life of stress  every single day.” 
Fifty years after 
punk culture took off on the streets and stages of the UK 
, the movement is alive and kicking in Brazil and across the world, from Indonesia and Myanmar to Colombia and Mexico. 
“The global south has really embraced punk culture as a way to respond to their own individual and local contexts  I suspect it’s outlived and gone global more than most people would probably have expected from the outset,” said Kevin Dunn, author of 
Global Punk: Resistance and Rebellion in Everyday Life 
. 
Dunn partly attributed that expansion to the flexibility of punk’s do-it-yourself culture. 
Colombian bands have embraced traditional Indigenous instruments while Mexican and Guatemalan sounds have influenced southern California’s punk scene. 
“It can mould to whatever kind of local musical tradition is around,” Dunn said. 
Punk music exploded in London and New York in the mid-1970s with bands such as the Sex Pistols and Ramones  although some trace its roots to 
a Peruvian group called Los Saicos (the Psychos) 
a decade earlier. 
Dunn called the movement “a response to the stultifying, oppressive aspects of life” and frustration at social conservatism, unemployment and the unfulfilled promises of modernisation. 
“There was a lot of discontent and what punk did was [capture] the forms of alienation that people felt  where the forces of life  economic, political, social  they’re all up there beating down on you  [Punks thought]: The world is shit and  we’re gonna push back.” 
Half a century later Latin American punks continue to push back, as police militarisation, gender-based violence, corruption, racism, inequality and a resurgence of authoritarian governance and far-right politics provide a backdrop and motivation. 
“Punk started over in Europe but it became much stronger here because the violence is so much worse,” said Cilirio, who has lost numerous friends and acquaintances to 
deadly police violence which disproportionately affects young black men. 
Brazil’s punk scene is focused on the hardscrabble working-class fringes of cities such as São Paulo, Belo Horizonte and Rio; places like the Morro da Lagartixa (Lizard Hill) favela, where Repressão Social formed in 1995. 
“It’s about police violence. 
It’s about poverty. 
It’s about all the people living on the streets. 
We deal with all of this [in our songs],” Cilirio, who friends call Abutre (Vulture) because of his religiously black attire, said during a Friday night band practice fuelled by dirt-cheap ginger cognac and cigarettes. 
The musician compared his socially divided city to colonial-era Brazil, when wealthy enslavers lived in opulent residences called the “casa grande” and their workers in quarters called the “senzala”. 
“This is the modern-day senzala,” Cilirio said of the depressed redbrick favelas that blanket the hills around his home. 
“They banished everyone here to the suburbs  and all they care about is our cheap workforce.” 
The band’s scarlet dreadlocked vocalist Vic Morphine, who lives in Rio’s oldest favela, Providência, said she had been drawn to punk by her indignation at social injustice and violence against women. 
“We feel angry  and we have reason to be angry,” said Morphine, 31, calling punk a way of “expressing all my outrage in my way of being, in my style, in my voice and in the music I make”. 
At a recent gig a barefoot Morphine launched into a fevered rendition of a song excoriating the barbarity of 21st-century life. 
“Massacres! 
Murders! 
 They snatch you! 
They kill you! 
There is no more hope!” 
she shrieked into the mic as a mixed-breed poodle with a pink mohican circled the mosh pit. 
Punk culture has spread far beyond Brazil’s big cities since it first landed in the land of samba and bossa nova at the tail-end of the 1964-85 dictatorship. 
One recent Sunday, scores of music fans flocked to a skate park in a rural city called Varginha to watch punk and hardcore bands, including Repressão Social play, although in true punk style, the Rio band failed to turn up. 
Moshing at the heart of the circle pit was Willkesley Franciscato, a 35-year-old punk with a circle-A tattoo on his biceps. 
“Punk has this really virulent ideology, like a virus. 
It has the capacity to contaminate people who are just fed up with everything…. 
Punk contaminates everyone who identifies with these questions of freedom, equality, believing in a better future,” Franciscato said. 
Varginha’s oldest punk, 45-year-old Kleberson Eugênio da Silva, believed the resurgence in punk culture under way in Brazil had come just in the nick of time. 
During the far-right 2018-2023 presidency of Jair Bolsonaro 
neo-Nazi skinheads came out of the woodwork 
, emboldened by 
his radical and racist rhetoric 
, Silva claimed. 
“It was a massive trigger for these guys to hit the streets  Before, they hid away  now you see them parading all over the place. 
We can’t allow this to grow,” said the punk who has a scar on his belly from being stabbed during an altercation with a Brazilian bonehead. 
Twenty-four hours after the police operation on Lizard Hill, calm had returned as Cilirio led the way through deserted streets covered in graffiti glorifying the local drug gang. 
In a cluttered backroom, he showed off a treasure trove of counterculture memorabilia: dog-eared demo tapes, screenprinted T-shirts and anarchist pamphlets. 
Punk rallying cries cried out from the collaged pages of handwritten punk zines in a mix of English and Portuguese. 
“Fight back  Hell Vomit  Fuck Nazi  Guns don’t kill hunger! 
 Resist!” 
Hanging from a washing line was a T-shirt stamped with a cartoon of a ski-masked punk decapitating Donald Trump with a hunting knife. 
“It’s a museum,” Cilirio said, showing off his group’s first record, 
a 14-track blaze 
of high-octane anti-establishment fury called Police Brutality. 
One zine in his collection contained the lyrics to a 1981 track by 
Discharge 
, a hardcore punk group from Stoke-on-Trent whose words perfectly captured the futility of Rio’s “war on drugs”. 
“It’s all a fuckin’ farce,” they said. 
“A stray bullet kills an innocent child. 
Nothing’s gained and nothing’s solved.” 
Another sheet of lyrics had been penned by Cilirio to celebrate his movement’s unstoppable global march. 
“We are suburban punks. 
Favela punks. 
Third world punks,” he wrote, before proclaiming: “Punk culture will never die”. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.3%Tom Phillips: 2.1%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Tom Phillips: 3.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic8.6%This article: 7.8%Tom Phillips: 1.0%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic7.8%This article: 2.1%Tom Phillips: 0.2%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias2.1%This article: 6.1%Tom Phillips: 1.6%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 12.3%Tom Phillips: 8.1%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect12.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Tom Phillips: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.3%This article: 6.0%Tom Phillips: 4.6%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias6.0%This article: 5.4%Tom Phillips: 2.2%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias5.4%This article: 43.5%Tom Phillips: 22.1%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias43.5%This article: 2.2%Tom Phillips: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias2.2%This article: 1.4%Tom Phillips: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.4%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 3.8%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Tom Phillips: 1.9%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 1.6%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Tom Phillips: 1.1%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.6%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.0%Tom Phillips: 2.4%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority5.0%This article: 1.0%Tom Phillips: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 1.1%Tom Phillips: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope1.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.4%Tom Phillips: 10.8%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization19.4%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 25.8%Tom Phillips: 11.1%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion25.8%This article: 3.2%Tom Phillips: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question3.2%This article: 10.8%Tom Phillips: 2.9%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.3%Tom Phillips: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.3%This article: 5.1%Tom Phillips: 1.1%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division5.1%This article: 11.9%Tom Phillips: 4.7%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal11.9%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.0%Tom Phillips: 1.6%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.6%Tom Phillips: 2.2%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote1.6%This article: 1.7%Tom Phillips: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 15.8%Tom Phillips: 19.8%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice15.8%This article: 6.2%Tom Phillips: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination6.2%This article: 9.9%Tom Phillips: 4.1%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias9.9%This article: 0.6%Tom Phillips: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%Tom Phillips: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1251 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers44%attributed speech696writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 100.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Dunn • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Dunn • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Dunn • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Dunn • 25 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Dunn • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 3 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 17 words • 100.0% coverageVic Morphine • 31 words • 0.0% coverageVic Morphine • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageVic Morphine • 1 words • 0.0% coverageVic Morphine • 1 words • 0.0% coverageVic Morphine • 4 words • 0.0% coverageVic Morphine • 3 words • 0.0% coverageVic Morphine • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWillkesley Franciscato • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWillkesley Franciscato • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWillkesley Franciscato • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKleberson Eugênio da Silva • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageKleberson Eugênio da Silva • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKleberson Eugênio da Silva • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKleberson Eugênio da Silva • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 2 words • 0.0% coverageRodrigo Cilirio • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Vic Morphine

100%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words15% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Indoctrination+47.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Vic Morphine: 47.1%47.1%Biased Writer Voice-28.4 ptsWriter: 28.4%Vic Morphine: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Vic Morphine: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Vic Morphine: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%Vic Morphine: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.