Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Communist Party results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 990 hits. Analysis detected 6,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,256 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,998 of 16,562 topics). This Communist Party is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Communist Party
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,256
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos