Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Commodity Shortages results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 635 hits. Analysis detected 7,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,912 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,291 of 16,562 topics). This Commodity Shortages is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Commodity Shortages
Topic details
Total words: 3,912
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.1% percentile
5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos