Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Commercial Waste Zones results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 2,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,766 of 16,562 topics). This Commercial Waste Zones is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Commercial Waste Zones
Topic details
Total words: 2,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.0%15.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.7%12.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos