Topic summary
â 31% 1 analyzed article/video 422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comedians results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Recency Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 955 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,266 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of â 64% (5,983 of 16,562 topics). This Comedians is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Comedians
Topic details
Total words: 1,266
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.9% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst