Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Combat Drones results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 316 hits. Analysis detected 2,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,616 of 16,562 topics). This Combat Drones is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Combat Drones
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.1%4.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos