Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Colorado River Drought results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 2,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Colorado River Drought is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Colorado River Drought
Topic details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos