Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Marcus Reichley results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 265 hits . Analysis detected 2,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Marcus Reichley is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Marcus Reichley
Author details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst