Topic summary
82% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Sports results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,424 hits . Analysis detected 16,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,915 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,217 of 15,772 topics). This College Sports is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. College Sports
Topic details
Total words: 15,915
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst