Topic summary
43%1 analyzed article/video454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Golf results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,362 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,363 of 16,562 topics). This College Golf is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
College Golf
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,362
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.5%15.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos