Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Collective Bargaining results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 1,196 hits. Analysis detected 4,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,637 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ā 84% (2,656 of 16,562 topics). This Collective Bargaining is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Collective Bargaining
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 84%Collective Bargaining (selected)7%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,637
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 45.4%45.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.3%27.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Politically Left Leaning ā€¦Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 45.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos