Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cold War Espionage results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,207 of 16,562 topics). This Cold War Espionage is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Cold War Espionage
Topic details
Total words: 2,424
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos