Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cold Deaths results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 3,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,531 of 16,562 topics). This Cold Deaths is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Cold Deaths
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.0%30.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos