Topic summary
74%2 analyzed articles/videos1,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cognitive Warfare results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 6,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,579 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,668 of 16,562 topics). This Cognitive Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Cognitive Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 6,579
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos