Topic summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cognitive Warfare results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 899 hits . Analysis detected 6,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,579 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,668 of 16,562 topics). This Cognitive Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Cognitive Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 6,579
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst