Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coffee Industry results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,001 hits. Analysis detected 6,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,987 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,719 of 16,562 topics). This Coffee Industry is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Coffee Industry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,987
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos