Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coca Cola 600 results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 724 hits. Analysis detected 3,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,547 of 15,145 topics). This Coca Cola 600 is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Coca Cola 600
Topic details
Total words: 4,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.2%16.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos