Topic summary
⁠24%2 analyzed articles/videos1,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coastal Hazards results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 3,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,551 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,310 of 16,562 topics). This Coastal Hazards is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Coastal Hazards
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,551
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos