Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coaching Scandals results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 1,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,641 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,983 of 16,246 topics). This Coaching Scandals is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Coaching Scandals
Topic details
Total words: 1,641
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.9%26.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos