Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coaching Hires results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 927 hits. Analysis detected 3,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,145 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,599 of 16,454 topics). This Coaching Hires is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Coaching Hires
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,145
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.2% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 43.2%43.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.3%15.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.6%13.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 43.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos