Topic summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos1,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coaching Hire results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 883 hits. Analysis detected 5,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,910 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,358 of 16,562 topics). This Coaching Hire is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Coaching Hire
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,910
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos