Topic summary
⁠95%2 analyzed articles/videos742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clocks results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 6,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,158 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,774 of 16,562 topics). This Clocks is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Clocks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,158
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos