Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Joshua Sammons results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 121 hits . Analysis detected 1,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Joshua Sammons is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Joshua Sammons
Author details
Total words: 1,932
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Nature: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst