Topic summary
81%1 analyzed article/video914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Litigation results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,054 of 16,562 topics). This Climate Litigation is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Climate Litigation
Topic details
Total words: 2,742
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos