Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video1,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Change Litigation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 999 hits. Analysis detected 7,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,145 of 16,562 topics). This Climate Change Litigation is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Climate Change Litigation
Topic details
Total words: 3,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 25.1%25.1%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 14.6%14.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.4%17.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos