Topic summary
⁠54%3 analyzed articles/videos3,676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Adaptation results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 2,292 hits. Analysis detected 14,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,140 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,248 of 16,442 topics). This Climate Adaptation is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Climate Adaptation
Topic details
Total words: 13,140
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos