Topic summary
⁠70%3 analyzed articles/videos3,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Action results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 2,377 hits. Analysis detected 14,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,706 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,433 of 16,562 topics). This Climate Action is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Climate Action
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,706
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 18.7%18.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos