Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Clergy results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Clergy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Clergy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos