Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleaning Products results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.5% saturation with 1,056 hits. Analysis detected 3,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,291 of 16,562 topics). This Cleaning Products is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Cleaning Products
Topic details
Total words: 2,742
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.2% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.9%21.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.7%16.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 38.5%38.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 38.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos