Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clay Travis results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.1% saturation with 1,271 hits. Analysis detected 6,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,323 of 16,494 topics). This Clay Travis is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Clay Travis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
9.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 58.1%58.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 54.8%54.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 35.2%35.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 17.4%17.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 20.5%20.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 58.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 54.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 35.2%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos