Topic summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claude Lemieux results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 419 hits . Analysis detected 2,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,550 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,916 of 16,562 topics). This Claude Lemieux is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Claude Lemieux
Topic details
Total words: 2,550
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.3% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst