Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clarence Thomas results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 1,918 hits. Analysis detected 8,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,558 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,436 of 16,562 topics). This Clarence Thomas is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Clarence Thomas
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,558
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.4%22.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos