Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Civilian Impact results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 482 hits. Analysis detected 2,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,770 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Civilian Impact is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Civilian Impact
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,770
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.7%17.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.2%27.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.4%4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.1%7.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos