Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Civilian Impact results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 482 hits . Analysis detected 2,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,770 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Civilian Impact is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Civilian Impact
Topic details
Total words: 1,770
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 27.2% 27.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 27.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst