Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civilian Harm Mitigation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,047 hits. Analysis detected 9,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,114 of 16,562 topics). This Civilian Harm Mitigation is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Civilian Harm Mitigation
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠64%Civilian Harm Mitigation (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.0%14.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos