Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civilian Harm results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 3,021 hits. Analysis detected 13,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,191 of 16,562 topics). This Civilian Harm is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Civilian Harm
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,892
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 51.3%51.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.5%22.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 25.4%25.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 12.2%12.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 51.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos