Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Unrest results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 1,614 hits. Analysis detected 10,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,396 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,800 of 16,562 topics). This Civil Unrest is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Civil Unrest
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.7%14.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos