Topic summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video2,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Society results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,060 hits. Analysis detected 8,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,377 of 15,769 topics). This Civil Society is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Civil Society
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,728
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos