Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Rights Organizations results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 692 hits. Analysis detected 6,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,831 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,766 of 16,562 topics). This Civil Rights Organizations is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Civil Rights Organizations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠72%Civil Rights Organizations (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,831
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos