Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Civil Military Relations results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 1,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,769 topics). This Civil Military Relations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Civil Military Relations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Civil Military Relations (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles928 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos